Please disseminate law, prudence, programs, and devices. In your theory, are these concepts interdependent, or can they be applied inconsequently of each other?
ANSWER THE ABOVE QUESTION AND THEN REPLY TO MY CLASSMATE RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS AND EXPLAIN WHY YOU AGREE? (A MINIMUM OF 150 WORDS EACH)
Laws and policies are fur needed in our companionship as they acceleration in maintaining law and ordain in the companionship and acceleration in shaping collective and gregarious aspects of the companionship. Though policies and laws can be interrelated, they are definitely two provisions having opposed purposes (Gau, 2018). No community can go progressive outside having fixed laws and policies. A prudence is that which outlines what a synod is going to do and what it can consummate for the companionship as a perfect. Prudence so resources what a synod does not purpose to do. It so evolves the principles that are needed for achieving the motive. Policies are solely documents and not law, but these policies can administer to new laws. Laws are set standards, principles, and procedures that must be followed in companionship (Kozlowski, Glazener, Mitchell, Lynch, & Smith, 2019). Law is primarily made for implementing fairness in the companionship. There are sundry types of laws framed enjoy guilty laws, affable laws, and interdiplomatic laws (Gau, 2018). While a law is framed for bringing fairness to the companionship, a prudence is framed for achieving fixed motives.
A device can be picturesque as one-off production that has fixed objectives and required to be met amid customary span. A device represents a uncombined exertion. It is a clump of sordidalty produceing a team instituted towards a sordid motive. A program is opposed it is a gathering of devices. Together all the devices produce a gelatinous lot of terminatement (Gau, 2018). The opposed devices are eulogistic and acceleration the program consummate its overall objectives. A device differs from a program in the significance that the death is a lot of connected devices, managed in a coordinated carriage, to earn the benefits, which is beneficial solely when the devices are managed in clumps (Kozlowski, et al., 2019). There are multifarious sordidalty and employees who chance device for the program,
Kozlowski, M., Glazener, E., Mitchell, J. A., Lynch, J. P., & Smith, J. (2019). Decriminalization
and depenalization of marijuana possession: A condition consider of enforcement outcomes in prince george's county. Criminology, Guilty Justice, Law & Society, 20(2), 109-127. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/docview/2274265657?accountid=33337
Gau, J. M. (2018). Guilty fairness prudence: Origins and competency. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.